Talkback: About the Online Chat Pages

Add your comment

From:	James Plaskett	2001-02-08 16:15:06
Subject:	Conversion of beliefs
Comment:	You say that nobody has changed their minds as a consequence of the slangings in 103...but I actuall have become much less of a Theist, not only through 103 but through the geneeral impossibility of getting any kind of a handle on the concept of God. If I say that he made it all, then I just push the question back, for I must then ask 'What made Him?' I remain, however, deeply anti-Darwinian. And I remain one convince, through personal experiences, of the existence of an invisible SPIRITUAL REALITy, which some people, like me, have occasionally accessed. However, this serves to do litle more than prompt me towards further attempts at EXPLORATION of the spiritual realm. Blind acceptance of a dogma, which suits Religionists, is anathema to me.
From:	paul ngalle	2001-10-25 06:27:49
Subject:	i'm happy to be inform
Comment:	tank you
From:	Kev	2002-01-20 18:58:53
Subject:	James Plaskett's error
Comment:	Dear James, I would like to let you hear a possible answer to your question; 'if God created everything, who created Him?' The answer is simple. When he created everything, he really did create everything. It's important that we understand, he created more than just molecules, and more than just physics. He is responsible for the creation of time and all related concepts we humans are so entrenched in. This means he created the concept of begining which is a law in this univeres but not applicable to God. When this is considered, the only difficulty lies in a concept that the perfect design of our reality creates the life supporting environment we all share. But all this should not be important to a man of faith... 'Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways acknoledge him, and he will make your paths straight.' Pr 3:5 NIV
From:	Ticcer	2002-01-23 07:52:45
Subject:	Answered Question????
Comment:	Kev, In your attempt to answer James Plasketts' question you have provided evidence that nullifies your own argument. Language is the vehical that the human race use to express itself. Lets examine a 'thing'. Every'thing' is a 'thing' of some sort regardless whether the 'thing' is a force, molecule, a feeling, emotion or whatever. Even 'God' is a 'thing' for if something is nothing then it isn't actually a 'thing' at all. However even if the paradox existed that 'nothing' were a 'thing' your logic would still be false or at least, you still haven't provided an answer. You say that 'God' created 'every'thing''. If 'God' is a thing, then he must have created himself because he created every 'thing' or to use your own words, 'When he created everything, he really did create everything.' This means that God created OUR Begining AFTER his OWN begining. If this is so, God did not create THE beginning, but NO-THING did. To suggest that God created himself, a thing, because, as you say, '...he really did create everything' is to say that God existed before he made himself, therefore, paradoxically leaving us with two Gods; which in turn renders the whole God concept utterly redundant. It also means that God is no longer omnipotent or at least, begs the question, 'Which God is God?' The flaw in your answer is in the fundamental flaw of blind faith, where everything unanswerable (and sometimes answerable) leads right back to itself, 'Blind Faith'. The only way your answer can be true, is if God has always existed which would mean there was NO actual beginning in the first place, therefore God never created such a thing.
From:	Ticcer	2002-01-23 07:53:20
Subject:	Answered Question????
Comment:	2....You argue that 'none' of the rules God created apply to himself. Again, this is based on the flawed 'blind faith' and ultimately proves nothing; It doesn't matter anyway because as I have shown, the very statement, 'When he created everything, he really did create everything' leaves us with a paradox of two Gods unless God himself is NOTHING. (If God is nothing then what's all the fuss about)
From:	Ticcer	2002-01-23 08:08:25
Subject:	Answered Question????
Comment:	3. PS I should have added to my first reply that, if God never created such a thing as a beginning (Due to the 'alledged' fact that he has always existed, therefore rendering the concept of a begining totally mute) then he never actualy created everything.
From:	menessier ngalle paul	2002-10-23 07:14:47
Subject:	why you cant oganise a meetting day
Comment:	i'm very busy noun and i leave in italie so thhat i want to meet you very soon tank you
From:	Paul Menessier Ngalle	2005-06-09 16:16:51
Subject:	importent de cogiter
Comment:	la philosophie de la pensée est partie intégrante de la vie de l'homme du commun , les questions métaphysiques que la philosophie a toujours discutées, surgissent, en vérité, d'expériences de l'homme du commun avant de trensformer ce dernier en une icone, elle manifeste aussi pour la plus part une autre potentialité politique et culturelle: celle de permettre la conceptualisation de la societe et la communication entre les générations humaines sur la planète. Dans une situation politique critique, nous avons vu, la pensée a le pouvoir de prévenir les fausses valeurs et fausses croyances et, par suite, celui de nous préparer à la faculté du jugement, ce qui est la plus politique des activités mentales.contact www multimediamenessier.com
From:	Thomas Channing	2005-12-20 20:07:19
Subject:	World Peace
Comment:	Yes, I do have the anwers. And it is Free. If the answer to World Peace cost you, it's not the right answer. I have a FREE website to get World Peace started. It has to start somewhere. But it can only start with those with open minds. If to this day you still hold beliefs as true, don't bother reading this site. If you know you already have the answers, don't read this site. To the rest of us, I guess, there is hope. www.freewebs.com/keyofsee/