Original shot. It's dreary yet, amazingly,
all is not lost. Time for some digital
mucking about!
Here is the digitally enhanced pic.
The lighting levels have been corrected, the
colours enhanced, contrast increased. Highlights
have been added or enhanced. This is particularly
true of the water, which has also been tinted
blue. Note also the vanishing of that wretched,
eye-abusing crane. Zap!
Another dull original shot.
This pic has been improved using similar techniques
to the previous shot. Notice here the the
top lamp is now decapitated, and a few blemishes
here and there have been purged. Also the
colours have been altered and pumped right
up.
The original. Not quite there, is it?
The change of colour here seems like a cheat,
but bizarrely, this image is much more faithful
to the actual colour of the scene as it appeared
to my eye. There was this astonishing red
glow but the camera washed out this fantastic
hue, so I digitally airbrushed the red back
into the scene. I left the top of the clouds
bluish to add a moody twist to the pic.
The Original
Behold the disappearance of the motor boat:
I digitally sank the damned thing. This image
not only looks more traditional sans the ugly
motor boat, but the composition is improved
as a bonus. Less can be more. Lighting levels
have been improved, contrast has been cranked
up and colours manipulated. Highlights and
shadows have been enhanced here and there
too.
Here the first thing to note is that the
building has been straightened, losing
the leaning, perspective look. The musicians
have been enhanced here by brightening
them. Notice the areas circled in red
on the original pic. These objectionable
objects have been mercilessly obliterated.
The Original. Oh my, this is underexposed
and out of focus. We're doomed!
Digital technology to the rescue! Firstly,
the lighting levels have been cranked
up. (Incidentally, changing levels is
not the same as simply turning
up the brightness. The darker areas remain
dark.) The image was sharpened and the
contrast hitched a notch or two. As always,
certain unwelcome details and distractions
have been toned down or killed. Many of
the reflections on the water have been
exaggerated, and the lighting of the architecture
tweaked here and there.
I've given a brief gist of what I did to jazz
up my pics (which shot with a digital camera,
incidentally). It should be noted that whilst
the original shots were a bit drab, this was
chiefly a lighting/hue/contrast issue. The composition
was intact. If you lack a good composition in
the first place, then digital tweaking (compositing
aside) is unlikely to make it really sweet to
the eye. Having said that, almost any raw image
can be digitally improved, often a great deal.
Many of the photographs you see published
these days are basically lies. Manipulations
are easily and quickly done, given a little
practice and skill.
The camera always lied, only now it is positively
Machiavellian. How appropriate then, that
these shots are of Italy!
See also
the page with these pics
and original commentary...
....and
Jim in Venice.
More shots, but with me in them. Uh oh! :)
Add your comment

 |  |  |  |  |
| From: |
Chris Georgiadis | Subject: | 2001-10-18 15:47:03 |
 | | | | |
| From: |
MadPole | Subject: | 2001-11-21 17:01:36 |
 | | | | |
| From: |
Lisa | Subject: | 2003-04-02 18:50:41 |
 | | | | |
| From: |
Wasif | Subject: | 2003-09-03 18:24:04 |
 | | | | |
| From: |
danielle longerbeam | Subject: | 2004-06-09 19:05:36 |
 | | | | |
| From: |
luke | Subject: | 2004-09-08 19:49:18 |
 | | | | |
help: how to add your comment Page hits: 12550