Adaptation
Directed by Spike Jonze
2003 UK 15 USA R
Review by Eadon
Adaptation is an increasingly rare breed of movie, a movie for grown-ups (I mutter, piously). Having said that, it is pleasingly titillating in places. More than that, it is intelligent (well, intelligent for a modern movie, anyway) and intelligence for me equates to intensity and not to dry ice.
Adaptation is about a Barton Fink-style writer (a screenwriter as it happens) with a dismal block. Here our protagonist is played by Nic Cage in a performance that has promoted my vague dislike of that actor into a more agreeable neutrality. He plays two characters in this movie, for lo! Our screenwriter has an identical twin.
Mr Cage's duty is to bang out a screenplay based on a book by Meryl Streep that concerns an orchid. But the book is shallow, there is something not quite right about it. The screenwriter's brother, himself seemingly shallow, is the one to realise this.
Ms Streep's story about the orchid revolves
around an impulsive eccentric (Chris Cooper)
whose rough, devil-may-care philosophy and antics
intrigue her much more than the flower she is
investigating.
Adaptation was not
as moving as it should have been, but I reveled
in the themes about mediocrity, passion, capriciousness
and self-delusion. However,
Adaptation
ultimately overplays its hand and loses much
of the pot it so deftly accrued.
Minor warning about content - minor spoiler ahead: There are a couple of shocking scenes within
Adaptation, where bad things happen. These arrive without warning; so if you are squeamish, beware.
 |
 |
 |
spoilers corner
Spoilers!!!!
Warning: this box contains a movie post-mortem analysis that freely gives away important plot twists and details. If you have not yet seen this movie and intend seeing it, avoid this spoilers box until afterwards. Bookmark the page, see the movie, see if you agree with my review then write an arsy comment saying I am talking total b*ll*cks :-)
|
| |
Those car crashes were shocking, the
way digital effects can portray anything
these days always disturbs me when used
in scenes like these, that look so real,
and are so unexpected.
The ending of Adaptation
didn't work. I felt as if the movie
was (deliberately?) taking the advice
of its own movie boffin within the movie
too seriously: everything depends on
the ending. Ironically, this was where
the movie unravelled: the acting became
stilted, as if the actors themselves
were uncertain how to play it, which
in turn seems to have been down to fuzzy
direction.
The movie lost me when Meryl suddenly
decreed that the screenwriter must be
murdered. A million bells rang false
in my head. That wasn't down to a character
arc: that was down to desperation. Up
to that point, though, Adaptation
was rather original and pleasing.
Of course, this ending could have been
a self-aware, sell-out ending, that
spoofs the usual, ridiculous Hollywood
endings, as was foreshadowed by the
advice of both the movie guru and Donald.
Drugs, sex, shootings, car crashes,
dire speeches about lurve, gators, death.
(With a good night's sleep betwixt the
horrors!!) But the ending was not exciting
enough or OTT enough to be completely
gratuitous, and so we ended up with
the worst of both worlds. The original
Scream pulled self-awareness off (its
dire sequels did
not), but ultimately self-awareness
is a gimmick. You can foist such cheap
irony upon your public once and get
away with it. This movie is so good
that it nearly gets away with
it. Adaptation
is a fun ride; analytical of obsession
and script-writing; playful; and a risk
taker: not bad for modern, dumbed-down
Hollywood.
|
|
There are no more spoilers below this
point, except maybe in any user talkback
comments.
End of spoilers corner
|
|
Dinosaurs. Hell, if you're going to do something
mad, do it properly.
Add your comment to this page

 |  |  |  |  |
| From: |
paul joyce | Subject: | 2004-09-06 14:02:18 |
 | | | | |
| From: |
Cris | Subject: | 2004-12-08 02:10:25 |
 | | | | |
| From: |
Rebecca | Subject: | 2005-09-10 16:54:21 |
 | | | | |
help: how to add your comment Page hits: 7399