movies section

Adaptation


How thoughtful of the movie studios to give away the plot in the trailer

s menu - click a section what's new at www.eadon.com philosophy movie reviews cartoons - garden of eadon cartoons bible satire pics, images and poems about nun whipping bishops etc :) philosophy wars discussions and battles on religion and many other maddening topics Jim on diets, daft names and other musings Feng Shui Hippo's zodiac - a spoof of astrology and feng shui here is info about me, jim eadon and more read my novel madpole - the maddest but truest philosopher on this planet coincidences of readers etc read and sign my guestbook links s
body frame image body frame image
s

Adaptation
Directed by Spike Jonze
2003 UK 15 USA R
Review by Eadon

Adaptation is an increasingly rare breed of movie, a movie for grown-ups (I mutter, piously). Having said that, it is pleasingly titillating in places. More than that, it is intelligent (well, intelligent for a modern movie, anyway) and intelligence for me equates to intensity and not to dry ice.

Adaptation is about a Barton Fink-style writer (a screenwriter as it happens) with a dismal block. Here our protagonist is played by Nic Cage in a performance that has promoted my vague dislike of that actor into a more agreeable neutrality. He plays two characters in this movie, for lo! Our screenwriter has an identical twin.

Mr Cage's duty is to bang out a screenplay based on a book by Meryl Streep that concerns an orchid. But the book is shallow, there is something not quite right about it. The screenwriter's brother, himself seemingly shallow, is the one to realise this.

Ms Streep's story about the orchid revolves around an impulsive eccentric (Chris Cooper) whose rough, devil-may-care philosophy and antics intrigue her much more than the flower she is investigating.

Adaptation was not as moving as it should have been, but I reveled in the themes about mediocrity, passion, capriciousness and self-delusion. However, Adaptation ultimately overplays its hand and loses much of the pot it so deftly accrued.



Minor warning about content - minor spoiler ahead: There are a couple of shocking scenes within Adaptation, where bad things happen. These arrive without warning; so if you are squeamish, beware.


s s s

spoilers corner


Spoilers!!!!
Warning: this box contains a movie post-mortem analysis that freely gives away important plot twists and details. If you have not yet seen this movie and intend seeing it, avoid this spoilers box until afterwards. Bookmark the page, see the movie, see if you agree with my review then write an arsy comment saying I am talking total b*ll*cks :-)


 





Those car crashes were shocking, the way digital effects can portray anything these days always disturbs me when used in scenes like these, that look so real, and are so unexpected.

The ending of Adaptation didn't work. I felt as if the movie was (deliberately?) taking the advice of its own movie boffin within the movie too seriously: everything depends on the ending. Ironically, this was where the movie unravelled: the acting became stilted, as if the actors themselves were uncertain how to play it, which in turn seems to have been down to fuzzy direction.

The movie lost me when Meryl suddenly decreed that the screenwriter must be murdered. A million bells rang false in my head. That wasn't down to a character arc: that was down to desperation. Up to that point, though, Adaptation was rather original and pleasing.

Of course, this ending could have been a self-aware, sell-out ending, that spoofs the usual, ridiculous Hollywood endings, as was foreshadowed by the advice of both the movie guru and Donald. Drugs, sex, shootings, car crashes, dire speeches about lurve, gators, death. (With a good night's sleep betwixt the horrors!!) But the ending was not exciting enough or OTT enough to be completely gratuitous, and so we ended up with the worst of both worlds. The original Scream pulled self-awareness off (its dire sequels did not), but ultimately self-awareness is a gimmick. You can foist such cheap irony upon your public once and get away with it. This movie is so good that it nearly gets away with it. Adaptation is a fun ride; analytical of obsession and script-writing; playful; and a risk taker: not bad for modern, dumbed-down Hollywood.


 


There are no more spoilers below this point, except maybe in any user talkback comments.

End of spoilers corner


s




Jim's preferred ending: Dinosaurs. Hell, if you're going to do something mad, do it properly.

Rating: 4/5
score



Do you think this movie is any good?

Click on one of the buttons below

12 3456789 10
Ghastly OK Fantastic
s View Results


Add your comment to this page

add a talkback

sssss
From: paul joyceSubject:2004-09-06 14:02:18
s
From: CrisSubject:2004-12-08 02:10:25
s
From: RebeccaSubject:2005-09-10 16:54:21
s
help: how to add your comment

Page hits: 7399



body frame image body frame image
s


www.eadon.com home sweet home contents: more stuff Next uninformed movie review


www.eadon.com