movies section

chicago


How thoughtful of the movie studios to give away the plot in the trailer

s menu - click a section what's new at www.eadon.com philosophy movie reviews cartoons - garden of eadon cartoons bible satire pics, images and poems about nun whipping bishops etc :) philosophy wars discussions and battles on religion and many other maddening topics Jim on diets, daft names and other musings Feng Shui Hippo's zodiac - a spoof of astrology and feng shui here is info about me, jim eadon and more read my novel madpole - the maddest but truest philosopher on this planet coincidences of readers etc read and sign my guestbook links s
body frame image body frame image
s

chicago
Directed by Rob Marshall
2003 12A/PG13

Chicago is a musical (eek! Stay away kids, blame Moulin Rouge, the movie that single-handedly revived the moribund idea of the singing and dancing gig :) As I was saying, Chicago is a musical set in the Jazz era in a certain American town. I forget which, haha

Chicago is a movie that, though nowhere near as great as Moulin Rouge! and much more vulgar, is, even so, nearly as entertaining. Two singers are sent to the slammer for murder. The movie is about their rivalry, especially for the attentions of a smart-arse lawyer who has never lost a case.

I loved all the performances in this movie. Zellweger and Zeta-Jones are pretty good as Roxanne 'Roxie' Hart & Velma Kelly even if sometimes the former does not seem to dance very well. Zeta Jones is the mistress of the art of portraying the bitchy chick, but Zellwegger was more than up to the job. Richard Gere pulled off the ostentatious lawyer with élan and skill, but I cannot help but wonder if a more naturally audacious actor could have really got his teeth into that juicy role. A possible case of miscasting methinks, if you disagree, sue me! John C Riley was touching as the confused, thick-as-pig-shit hubby. He reminded me of the late English comedian Tommy Cooper for some bizarre reason. Queen Latifah as the corrupt Prison Warden needed to be more intimidating, but I loved her song. There are saucy dances of prison inmates in very kinky, very-unprison-like garb, LOL. Indeed there was a puppeteer routine that is enchanting visually and wonderfully weird aurally: Gere’s and Zellweger’s voices seem to be morphed together to produce an almost alien hybrid timbre, not quite male or female.

I am not sure how Chicago compares to its predecessors, such as 'All That Jazz' (1979), as I have not seen them, so I have no choice but to take this movie at face value. Chicago shot past pleasantly, and I was charmed by most of it, although one of the characters becomes surprisingly unsympathetic towards the end. Another oddity is one scene that is a real downer, and jarringly out of place in this fun, make-believe, spirited flick. The ending confused me on a couple of points, and left a bit of a sour taste too. I delve into these points in the Spoiler Zone. But I really like this movie, it has imperfections but at least they are interesting imperfections.



s s s

spoilers corner


Spoilers!!!!
Warning: this box contains a movie post-mortem analysis that freely gives away important plot twists and details. If you have not yet seen this movie and intend seeing it, avoid this spoilers box until afterwards. Bookmark the page, see the movie, see if you agree with my review then write an arsy comment saying I am talking total b*ll*cks :-)


 

The gallows scene was really awful, particularly because it was too effective! The lonely spectacle of the poor lass sobbing on the platform was heartbreaking (almost). Strange. The scene obviously helped to create tension, as poor Rene realised the full horror of her potential fate, but even so, it was too depressing to behold. After all, this movie is definitely nothing to do with reality so it beats me why this of all scenes was portrayed vaguelly realistically. Make us miserable and destroy the spell of the fantasy into the bargain, super idea :)

After Zellweger became spoiled and rather unpleasant, her character didn’t seem to recover its original charm. Maybe the movie was making some insightful social commentary, but at what cost? Zelweger character started off as a lovely flower and ended up a thistle. The husband saw this transformation and turned away in depression, having had his hopes of a child dashed on cruel rocks. He was not blameless, but his predicament was not resolved. He was obviously a good, kindly man, but he was abandoned to be wretched, unless I missed a plot detail. It was touching acting by John C. Riley and his character deserved a happy ending, and the girls deserved a comeuppance. I felt that this movie needed to be much more feel-good, forget realism. And I never thought I would say that of an American movie. Is the world getting too cynical even for me or am I going soft? Of course, savage editing may have cut out the odd scene or two, which would account for the troubling loose ends.

These grumbles are not showstoppers; as most of Chicago is a delight, the movie takes risks, it is creative, often brilliant, and has buckets of charm. At the end I wanted the Chicago to last just that little bit longer, which I suppose is a symptom of having been exposed to successful show biz.






 


There are no more spoilers below this point, except maybe in any user talkback comments.

End of spoilers corner


s




Jim's preferred ending: The hobbits get hanged. Oops. Wrong movie

Rating: 4/5
score


Do you think this movie is any good?

Click on one of the buttons below

12 3456789 10
Ghastly OK Fantastic
s View Results


Add your comment to this page

add a talkback

sssss
From: madsterSubject:2003-03-09 21:52:32
s
From: AlyssaSubject:2003-05-06 22:55:17
s
help: how to add your comment

Page hits: 8410



body frame image body frame image
s


www.eadon.com home sweet home contents: more stuff Next uninformed movie review


www.eadon.com