movies section

Chicken Run


How thoughtful of the movie studios to give away the plot in the trailer

s menu - click a section what's new at www.eadon.com philosophy movie reviews cartoons - garden of eadon cartoons bible satire pics, images and poems about nun whipping bishops etc :) philosophy wars discussions and battles on religion and many other maddening topics Jim on diets, daft names and other musings Feng Shui Hippo's zodiac - a spoof of astrology and feng shui here is info about me, jim eadon and more read my novel madpole - the maddest but truest philosopher on this planet coincidences of readers etc read and sign my guestbook links s
body frame image body frame image
s



I am narked. Why? I'll explain later.

Chicken Run was hatched from the same production company, Aardman (based in Bristol, England) as made the sublime Wallace and Gromet short animated films. These films, including the feature-length Chicken Run are made using stopgap animation of plastercine models.

With witty allusions to The Great Escape and its ilk Chicken Run, a film about chickens trying to escape a prison-camp like farm, starts well but then, suddenly, alarmingly, becomes, well, a bit naff. There was nothing to keep us amused but bothersome, nattering chickens waddling about the place. I was wondering if Aadman had lost their touch. But don't worry! The middle of the film, thanks partly to the arrival of a proud rooster saviour (Mel Gibson) but chiefly to the appearance of fantastical Heath Robinson-style machines of wondrous invention, bursts into life and Chicken Run kept up the brilliance right to the end. The ending is wrapped up quite neatly. This is in stark contrast to the demented ending of Mission Impossible 2 released in England about the same time.

My main grouch, a minor one, is that the chicken characters were not all that memorable with the worthy exception of a fantastic old anecdote toting Ex-RAF buffer. Even the rooster played by Mel Gibson seemed a bit nondescript. But luckily... rats stole the show, believe it or not. Two crafty cockney dodgy comedy rodents pitched up. Now I can't bear barrow boy cockney accents any more than the next fellow, but these shifty rats half-inched the funniest lines and scenes of the film and they deserve every second of their glory.

Oh yes, why am I narked? Because Hollywood films made by yanks feature yanks as the good guys and Brits as the villains. Where as Chicken Run, made in Britain and funded by Hollywood (Dreamworks) features Brits as the villains and a Yank as the hero who saves the day. Chicken Run aside, this endless cliché is another sign of the general decline of the quality of films under the Hollywood monopoly. A more serious malaise is Hollywood's historical films. Brits are often portrayed as fascist, Germans as idiots and the Americans (to the great surprise of all historians and WW2 veterans themselves but it must be true because Hollywood says so) cracked the Enigma code in WW2 and single handedly won the war, etc etc. This is not a healthy situation. Hollywood has all the distribution and therefore the cash but it has no integrity, no sense of shame. To hell with history and quality. Rant, rant, rant!


Jim's preferred ending: More comedy rats.

Rating: 4.5/5
score


Do you think this movie is any good?

Click on one of the buttons below

12 3456789 10
Ghastly OK Fantastic
s View Results


Add your comment to this page

add a talkback

sssss
From: Jerry WilliamsSubject:2003-08-16 09:16:29
s
From: Mark RadburnSubject:2004-11-05 22:03:23
s
help: how to add your comment

Page hits: 3923



body frame image body frame image
s


www.eadon.com home sweet home contents: more stuff Next uninformed movie review


www.eadon.com