movies section

Gladiator


How thoughtful of the movie studios to give away the plot in the trailer

s menu - click a section what's new at www.eadon.com philosophy movie reviews cartoons - garden of eadon cartoons bible satire pics, images and poems about nun whipping bishops etc :) philosophy wars discussions and battles on religion and many other maddening topics Jim on diets, daft names and other musings Feng Shui Hippo's zodiac - a spoof of astrology and feng shui here is info about me, jim eadon and more read my novel madpole - the maddest but truest philosopher on this planet coincidences of readers etc read and sign my guestbook links s
body frame image body frame image
s



Maximus (Russell Crow) is a successful general and favourite of the dying, wise and benevolent emperor Marcus Aurelius (Richard Harris). The emperor is succeeded by his morally bankrupt son Commodus (Joaquin Phoenix) who sees to it that very bad things indeed happen to Maximus. Commodus stages gladiatorial games in the Colosseum to pacify the citizens with blood. But such a cheap tactic designed to woo popularity can be, to use an apt cliché, a double edged sword. And so it transpires that Maximus ends up having to fight for his life as a gladiator, whilst seeking vengeance.

This was one of those oddly frustrating films: interesting, good, but needlessly nobbled. I expected super things from Gladiator but I didn't quite get into it. I was expecting too much of this movie, having subconsciously been affected by the hype. This is usually a mistake and it was here. One expects greatness and is disappointed by a normally pleasing very good.

The film is a shade too long at two and a half hours. "Epics" are perfectly fine as far as I was concerned. The point of an epic is that you get drawn more deeply into the characters and the story. By the climax of the film our intimacy has built up over the long running time so that there is more punch and poignancy when the ending strikes, making a consummation more likely. Alas the satisfying ending didn't quite materialise.

Another problem with the epic nature of Gladiator was that the reverse happened to what was intended. As the film progressed the characters, which at first seemed fascinating, began to lose their enigma and charm. In the end they actually seemed less rounded and developed than when they started out.

Yet Gladiator is often marvellous, with great swathes of enjoyable scenes and scenery, fine acting and memorable conflicts. The violence is heavy but in context. This is a film that deserves credit.

Crowe is an incredible actor. Here he had to play wronged and tragic angst for an awful lot of screen time. It is a testament to his skill that he managed to remain so watchable under such adverse conditions. Phoenix was watchable as the barking mad, despotic, yet insecure Emperor. However he needed to be more menacing and intimidating to match his role as arch villain. This would have created some suspense in the later acts of the film.

The special effects shots of Rome and the Colosseum were great fun but, to nit pick, they didn't quite convince, looking blurred and often dark. When they perfect this type of special effect, films like this are going to be yet more amazing to watch.

Gladiator was stygean and gloomy for pretty much all the time and this had an effect on the spirit like the winter blues. (Or it might just have been caused by the hangover from a Stag Night the night before in Shrewsbury.) But... it is well worth seeing Gladiator, it is a great spectacle. The opening battle against the Huns and many of the gladiatorial scenes were thrilling. Oliver Reed was riveting as Proximo, the gladiator manager. Reed himself died in the midst of production. The film featured some tricks to keep him going in the film but you could tell because his scenes grew shorter and lost their power. Instead of writing him out of the story quickly, they let him linger in a weird, fading, digitally-assisted undead state until he finally expired (in the film) with more of a fizzle than a deserved bang. How poignant, when his living performance was so incredibly enjoyable. He was a tempest of interest that Gladiator was so in need of, which blew itself out so tragically prematurely. The movie seemed to die with him. It is surprising how many films suffer unduly once an interesting character disappears.

RIP Oliver Reed. I will never forget his appearance on a live, late-night English talk show called After Dark where he got plastered and rudely teased a witless, humourless and charmless feminist. It was the most memorable and amusing thing I have ever seen on the box.


Jim's preferred ending: When the protagonists try to verbally justify the ending to one another, you just know the conclusion is going to be slightly dodgy. Indeed, this ending, except for one or two nice touches, was a conventional cliché that Gladiator should have risen above. The preferred climax is, of course a rollicking Roman orgy. What better way to end a film? What better way to start a film for that matter? What better way to spice up the middle of a film? I vote for all three :P

Rating: 4/5
score


Do you think this movie is any good?

Click on one of the buttons below

12 3456789 10
Ghastly OK Fantastic
s View Results


Add your comment to this page

add a talkback

sssss
From: hung-pieceSubject:2002-01-11 19:23:50
s
From: lil rat gangsta ggc 4 lyfSubject:2006-02-11 00:19:26
s
help: how to add your comment

Page hits: 9751



body frame image body frame image
s


www.eadon.com home sweet home contents: more stuff Next uninformed movie review


www.eadon.com