movies section

Godzilla


How thoughtful of the movie studios to give away the plot in the trailer

s menu - click a section what's new at www.eadon.com philosophy movie reviews cartoons - garden of eadon cartoons bible satire pics, images and poems about nun whipping bishops etc :) philosophy wars discussions and battles on religion and many other maddening topics Jim on diets, daft names and other musings Feng Shui Hippo's zodiac - a spoof of astrology and feng shui here is info about me, jim eadon and more read my novel madpole - the maddest but truest philosopher on this planet coincidences of readers etc read and sign my guestbook links s
body frame image body frame image
s



The critics and public have been unkind to this film. I suspect this is partly a consequence of the films obese marketing effort. If you hype a film then the film had better be good or you have effectively hyped it to death. Critics will be tempted to jump on the films faults to demonstrate their immunity and independence from the marketing effort. The public will expect a real treat and then feel disappointed if their hype-generated high expectations are not absolutely satisfied.

I went into the film having read a couple of bad reviews even from action blockbuster-friendly mags. So I braced myself for the worst but still expected to be entertained by the special effects and seeing New York get beaten up. Did the film deliver? Yes - in these narrow areas.

The film blamed the French for the monster and ensuing disaster. Conversely, for me, it was a French chap who rescued the film, Monsieur Jean Reno. Normally monsters seem stuck on to the celluloid like a sticker because they seem artificial. Here Reno seems stuck on to the film because everything else was artificial.

Broderic was predictably as fun to watch as drizzle. His romantic sidekick failed to get killed, unlike Godzilla, so no happy ending then. Why was this leading couple so wretched? To make Godzilla the Star Of The Show by way of odious comparisons with real life actors.

The special effects were incredible. If people had seen this a few years ago the film would have Jurassic Park status or more. What is astonishing is that we now seem to take the brilliant effects for granted. They no longer seem quite so "Wow". For effects of this quality this must be upsetting for the creators of the effects.

Godzilla is not the only victim of people's rapid acclimatisation and taken-for-granted-seen-it-before immunity to special effects. The Lost World failed to capture the imagination largely because of this phenomenon. Speilberg boasted about cutting down on the dinosaurs to save money but this was a big mistake. He should have doubled and quadrupled the number and diversity of the dinosaurs, not just served up the same old dinos with a token new one here and there.

In summary, a plot free movie must flaunt special effects of exponentially increasing brilliance and novelty to keep people impressed. Godzilla actually achieved the special effects excellence but blew it by raising expectations too high with unwise and expensive marketing. But nothing went too wrong, for the film is successful and that is the point of a blockbuster. See the film for the effects. Only.


Jim's preferred ending: They put a nuke up Godzilla's arse and rocket it into outer-space to blow up the asteroid in Armageddon.

Rating: 1.5/5
score


Do you think this movie is any good?

Click on one of the buttons below

12 3456789 10
Ghastly OK Fantastic
s View Results


Add your comment to this page

add a talkback

sssss
From: Mark RadburnSubject:2004-11-05 22:07:15
s
From: MadPoleSubject:2005-06-05 14:28:24
s
From: Luke BlackAdderSubject:2005-07-07 03:28:45
s
From: George JobsonSubject:2006-05-11 11:36:12
s
From: mike maratheftisSubject:2007-03-05 19:51:34
s
help: how to add your comment

Page hits: 5116



body frame image body frame image
s


www.eadon.com home sweet home contents: more stuff Next uninformed movie review


www.eadon.com