movies section

lord of the rings part 3
The Return Of The King


How thoughtful of the movie studios to give away the plot in the trailer

s menu - click a section what's new at www.eadon.com philosophy movie reviews cartoons - garden of eadon cartoons bible satire pics, images and poems about nun whipping bishops etc :) philosophy wars discussions and battles on religion and many other maddening topics Jim on diets, daft names and other musings Feng Shui Hippo's zodiac - a spoof of astrology and feng shui here is info about me, jim eadon and more read my novel madpole - the maddest but truest philosopher on this planet coincidences of readers etc read and sign my guestbook links s
body frame image body frame image
s



Lord of the Rings: The Return Of The King
Directed by Peter Jackson
2003 PG 13/12A

Lord of the Rings - The Return Of The King, the final installment of Peter Jackson's movie trilogy based on Tolkein's Lord Of The Rings, is a work of collective genius. Until now I thought it was mandatory for movie franchises to unravel into an unsatisfying soup of diminishing returns by the third installment, assuming they crawl that far. It is all the more impressive, then, that The Return Of The King is a triumph of great story, great fantasy and great direction: the best movie of a fantastic trilogy! There are a couple of minor niggles, which I reveal in Spoilers Corner, but this movie is as perfect as movies get, let alone blockbusters.

Firstly, the characters in LOTR are so appealing that it feels rather sad when the unfortunate ones peg it. In fact it is almost painful to watch the Riders Of Rohan or the troops of Gondor get mashed beneath foot of troll or poked by orcish arrow. Rarely in recent Hollywood-produced movies do I cheer on the good guys, and in this movie I did. This movie reawakened the excited kid in me. Mind you, ROTK is awash with violent horror that might disturb younger kiddies as much as it will delight the older ones.

Beneath its gleaming armour there is something covertly politically incorrect about the Lord Of The Rings trilogy and this lends the series a refreshing, sincere nobility. Real men fight in the wars (only the hobbits are allowed to be wimpy) and the women and children must be protected. This valour is true to ancient history. This valour is good old-fashioned ass-kicking macho fun that most movie makers have forsaken these days in reverence to bloodless PC fascism.

The acting is universally superb, which is particularly impressive given so much can go wrong. Note the debacle of Anakin and Queen BadActress in effects-intensive movies such as Star Wars: Attack Of The Clones.

The LOTR trilogy is fun, and just about everyone else seems delighted with it too. It appeals to our raw instinct! Praise the gods that no lame do-gooder was able to insist upon a token PC compromise. Imagine a Trinity/Halle Berry-type androgynous leather-clad heroine pitching up: a steely, spunky heroine who cannot act for toffee - shudder. They could have really screwed things up. It infinitely fortunate that they didn't Tomb Raider-ise this trilogy. OK, there is an utterly implausible female-warrior-in-battle scene, but even that potential travesty, an indulgence, which is not to be found in Tolkien's novel, works in the context of setting up an emotional scene. And at least the vivacious Eowyn seems reluctant, vulnerable and, well, so achingly feminine.

When you actually care (more or less) about what is going on in a movie then the special effects are of secondary importance. Conversely if you don't give a flying turd what is going on (think Matrix Revolutions), then effects won't save the day. But when you care AND the effects are GUT BLASTINGLY STUNNING, then you have movie elysium on your hands. One reason the effects work here pisses all over most movies is because the action chiefly takes place in broad daylight, you can actually revel in the beauty and the horror. The effects have no need to hide themselves in rain or darkness, they are emblazoned upon the screen in full splendour. Dingy night time effects beloved of less imaginative movies are unsatisfying in comparison. Even The Two Towers was slightly guilty of this crime.

The visual and AI effects in this movie are vastly superior to its two predecessors, and they are impressive. Digital effects movies that made my jaw drop due to their novelty at the time were Terminator 2 for it's morphing innovation and Jurassic Park for it's novel beastie animation. The bullet-time effects in the original The Matrix and the "Burly Brawl" of Matrix Reloaded can be added to the list at a push. Return of the King effects have impressed me more than any movie since Jurassic Park, kudos to Weta. There isn't anything genuinely novel here, effects wise, but what impresses is the audacious scale and integration of those effects. Gollum is great, of course, but what really stands out are the immense battles. The crowds and and the monsters on the battle field are stunning. The effects in the previous LOTR movies are superlative, but ROTK trumps all that went before.

And the mockney accents of the comedy orcs work surprisingly well. Another stunning trick Jackson pulled off was to make the hated orcs simultaneously fearsome in their ant-like multitudes, and funny. These were well needed breaks from the laudably ernest performances of the hero characters (dwarfs excepted). Another trap that Jackson sensibly avoided was to insert a non-stop-chattering character as comic relief, like that annoying green testicle in Monsters Inc.

After a lousy blockbuster year, it is pleasant to declare my exaltation for The Return Of The King. The word anticlimax is definitely not in the LOTR trilogy's vocab, not in human, elvish, orcish, dwarvish or even hobbitish.

Incredible.



s s s

spoilers corner


Spoilers!!!!
Warning: this box contains a movie post-mortem analysis that freely gives away important plot twists and details. If you have not yet seen this movie and intend seeing it, avoid this spoilers box until afterwards. Bookmark the page, see the movie, see if you agree with my review then write an arsy comment saying I am talking total b*ll*cks :-)


 

This movie was so pleasingly kick-ass, doubly so after the crushingly disappointing Matrix Revolutions. Compare Trinity's croaking it scene from Revolutions with the compassion of Theoden's demise. The former was trite, absolutely laughable. The latter was poignant: a bit too picturesque, perhaps, but hey, this is fantasy. This comparison proves that Jackson can direct emotional scenes, whereas the Wachowski brothers are horribly fallible in this art. The piss poor acting of Reeves and Trinity (and at least Trinity can act) is exposed here also, though much of the blame lies with hollow, MTV-style direction, plot and the god-awful Revolutions dialogue.

Nanoscopic ROTK Niggle 1: some scenes were too far fetched, the apparent aim to create as much tension as possible during some conflicts comes unstuck when implausibility undermines those scenes. Take Shelob v. Sam: fat spider, no doubt about it. Take Ringwraith v. Eowyn: Ringwraith has full belly. Troll v. Aragorn: squashed prince, mashed potato style.


Nanoscopic Niggle 2: where was Saruman? Surely they could have left out the interminable, cutesy hobbits ending(s) and restored Christopher Lee into the mix.

Nanoscopic Niggle 3, the cutesy hobbit ending(s) dragged on for far too long. Though I did approve of Sam's fine taste in hobbit babes.

ROTK's most stunning scenes were the assault on Gondor. I'm thinking of watching this movie again just to marvel at that spectacle: the camera following the trebuchet ballast; the chuffed look on the goblin general's face when a block of debris just misses him; the charge of the Riders through the feet of the towering, stomping mammoth beasts; the merciless thrashing by said elephants of the cavalry with their tusks (those things make Persian war elephants look like ponies); Legolas' ascent of one of those creatures using stuck arrows like rungs of a ladder, and his slide down the trunk; Gimli's narked insistence that Legolas's stylish defeat of the monster still only counted as one kill; the eyeball-popping zoom out from Denethors flaming tumble to the battle action; the Ring Wraiths flinging squaddies from the citadel walls; the mace-swinging trolls, the incredible detail and panoramic ambition shook me like a Ringwraiths scream.

The direction, score, scenery, casting, score, costumes, weaponry, characterisation, pace and cinematography are all worshipful. Just as awesome was the beauty and charm of princess Eowyn, what a jewel that woman is. Aragorn must have transiently lacked testosterone to resist those imploring eyes.




 


There are no more spoilers below this point, except maybe in any user talkback comments.

End of spoilers corner


s




Jim's preferred ending: Fewer "endings" would have been nice, just when you think this movie is about to finish...

Rating: 5/5
score


Do you think this movie is any good?

Click on one of the buttons below

12 3456789 10
Ghastly OK Fantastic
s View Results


Add your comment to this page

add a talkback

sssss
From: blackjesusSubject:2003-12-27 10:18:12
s
From: Alex W.Subject:2004-01-15 10:58:40
s
From: CrozzerSubject:2004-01-27 09:01:29
s
From: Shelby ShermanSubject:2004-02-02 13:10:04
s
From: PyramidSubject:2004-02-24 00:57:29
s
From: Mark RaburnSubject:2004-11-05 22:28:30
s
From: VictoriaSubject:2005-01-29 05:42:41
s
From: meSubject:2007-08-12 04:06:40
s
help: how to add your comment

Page hits: 7885



body frame image body frame image
s


www.eadon.com home sweet home contents: more stuff Next uninformed movie review


www.eadon.com