movies section

spider-man


How thoughtful of the movie studios to give away the plot in the trailer

s menu - click a section what's new at www.eadon.com philosophy movie reviews cartoons - garden of eadon cartoons bible satire pics, images and poems about nun whipping bishops etc :) philosophy wars discussions and battles on religion and many other maddening topics Jim on diets, daft names and other musings Feng Shui Hippo's zodiac - a spoof of astrology and feng shui here is info about me, jim eadon and more read my novel madpole - the maddest but truest philosopher on this planet coincidences of readers etc read and sign my guestbook links s
body frame image body frame image
s



Spider-man
Directed by Sam Raimi

Spider-man - for me this was the least anticipated "event movie" in memory, although I've probably forgotten plenty. I yawned and went to see this thing anyway after a bitch of a day. I asked myself if a spider-man movie could be anything more fragrant than a steaming turd. Only Tim Burton could have made Spider-man work. I felt sorry for the director (Sam Raimi), for taking on this sorry task, but then I remembered that he was paid more to make this movie than I'll bother making in my entire tragical life. So I stopped feeling sorry for him forthwith.

A worse omen was that Spidey is played by an actor who inspires the same sense of grotesque dread as Tom Cruise. I knew I was not going to love this movie. But, as a kid I was hooked on spider-man on TV. So I went along to watch this bitch.

Basically Spider-man sucked. But it didn't suck as much as I thought it would. But suck Spider-man did.

Plot - weird geek gets bitten by a genetically modified spider. Geek metamorphoses into a weird superhero in a ridiculous costume. Hero fights ridiculous enemy called The Green Goblin.

(I liked the newspaper editor. The rest sucked lemons).




But... But.... (shhhhhhhhhh....) actually I enjoyed this movie - a bit..


s s s

spoilers corner


Spoilers!!!!
Warning: this box contains a movie post-mortem analysis that freely gives away important plot twists and details. If you have not yet seen this movie and intend seeing it, avoid this spoilers box until afterwards. Bookmark the page, see the movie, see if you agree with my review then write an arsy comment saying I am talking total b*ll*cks :-)


 

The chick in this movie fell from a tall building. A split second before her beautiful teeth were about to be mixed with her brains in a pavement omelette she was grabbed by a skydiving weirdo in a freaky red skin-tight suit, swept around the streets on the end of a bit of elastic and dumped in a park. And all she could do was smile! I think that she might at least have had the decency to wet herself - or at least look a bit pale.

Then she wonders down a sinister alley and is accosted by a gang of vile cretins intent on raping her - or worse. They make no secret of their intentions with disgusting gestures and grunts. This is every woman's worst nightmare (apart from that teeth and brains omelette thing). Then she is rescued by our Spidey. Again, she is all brilliant-white smiles. Where were the tears of shock, revulsion and fear?

I am wondering who was really bitten by that GM spider, him or her?

I'm taking the piss, but actually I'm a sucker for that damsel in distress lark. There will always be a protective instinct in blokes that will be awakened by popcorn movies like Spider-man. To save a girl from peril featured in my most powerful dream - when I was about five.

  There are, of course, millions of plot holes. For example, how can a man who's reactions and dexterity are so superhuman he can catch the falling girl mentioned above not prevent a mere drop of blood falling to the floor? (Then he soundlessly escapes from the room in about 2 seconds). I could go on... but I won't.

As for the final scrap, a grenade went off in his face, for f*cks sake.




 


There are no more spoilers below this point, except maybe in any user talkback comments.

End of spoilers corner


s




More on Spider-man...
s s s

spidey feedback


 
Andrew Zagozda read this review of Spider-man and he emailed me thus:

>Minor Spoilers< Jim, Jim, Jim.... So far I've always found your movie reviews pretty accurate (ish!). Even though you have a few (minor) points in your review - ok, constantly smiling girl was annoying (maybe just adrenaline?); also, he couldn't catch the blood when it fell because he would have fallen off the ceiling! - I still think the film had a great many more good points than weak points.

Admittedly, I used to love watching the cartoons so I'm very biased, but the film matched the plot in the cartoons amazingly well. How much fun was that wrestling scene! The newspaper editor was class. Thinking about it again, I honestly can't see very much wrong with it, and as a self-confessed Spiderman fan, I don't see how you can either!

By the way, what other films have Tobey Maguire been in before? Why don't you like him? Just curious. Also, Kirsten Dunst (mainly because of a cheerleading film called Bring It On), is in my top 10 sexiest women in the world list! Always a bonus to my enjoyment of the movie! *grin*

AZ

Jim Responds:
The girl is always smiling - absolutely! Terrible things happen to her all the time, at home and in the examples I gave. Why show the horror and then undermine the effect by making her grin like a crocodile?

You say he couldn't catch the blood without falling from the ceiling? That contradicts the staggering dexterity he displayed through out the rest of the movie. Remember he can move supernaturally fast. He could have caught that blood before gravity even blinked. And who says he needs both hands to cling to the ceiling? Bullshit.

You say "I still think the film had a great many more good points than weak points". I agree. I gave the movie 3/5. That's 3 strong points against two week points. Or 60%. Not a bad score. That means I liked Spider-man over all. I am not one of those reviewers that gives all movies a score over 50% except the really bad ones.

The reason that I didn't think this movie was great was because I didn't buy into it. It didn't seem magical like comparable fare like Star Wars: Attack Of The Clones or Lord of the Rings. I didn't buy into the characters, especially the Parker relationship with his best mate. The action scenes were fake, and - worse - they were not exhilarating. There was no suspense. And it had a blatant frigging ad for a can of pop in it. But as I said, even though Spider-man was sucky, paradoxically I enjoyed it. Where it was strong was on fantasy - beating up bad guys and rescuing dames.

Not sure where I saw the actor Tobey Maguire before. He looks familiar. Probably mostly from the trailers. It's just that he looks a bit, well, too squeaky clean for my liking. But that's probably just me. He acted rather well.

And yes, Kirsten Dunst is ludicrously desirable. Watching her get drenched in the rain definitely made my spidey sense tingle somewhat. >Insert your own sticky white web joke here<

- Jim
 
s




Jim's preferred ending: The nasty murder of Jar Jar Binks. Oops, wrong movie...

Rating: 3/5
score


Do you think this movie is any good?

Click on one of the buttons below

12 3456789 10
Ghastly OK Fantastic
s View Results


Add your comment to this page

add a talkback

sssss
From: Black JesusSubject:2003-10-15 21:26:22
s
From: TaZSubject:2005-09-03 17:58:44
s
From: SamanthaSubject:2006-02-24 23:51:31
s
help: how to add your comment

Page hits: 5661



body frame image body frame image
s


www.eadon.com home sweet home contents: more stuff Next uninformed movie review


www.eadon.com