movies section

Troy


How thoughtful of the movie studios to give away the plot in the trailer

s menu - click a section what's new at www.eadon.com philosophy movie reviews cartoons - garden of eadon cartoons bible satire pics, images and poems about nun whipping bishops etc :) philosophy wars discussions and battles on religion and many other maddening topics Jim on diets, daft names and other musings Feng Shui Hippo's zodiac - a spoof of astrology and feng shui here is info about me, jim eadon and more read my novel madpole - the maddest but truest philosopher on this planet coincidences of readers etc read and sign my guestbook links s
body frame image body frame image
s



Troy
Directed by Wolfgang Petersen
Review by Jim Eadon
2004

Movie starts. Before long we are subjected to mind-rotting >whiney woman moaning music<.

Helen of Troy-The-Movie is pretty rather than classically beautiful. However, if installed in an average office she would be considered an uber babe: the face that launched a thousand saucy emails. In the movie, though, her's was the fake (performance) that launched a thousand CGI triremes. Obligatory Helen jokes aside, if the acting wench had been more skillfully directed in Troy, i.e. perhaps instructed to be seductive rather than confoozed, she could have come across as irresistible.

>Whiney woman moaning music<

We (or at least I) don't want Helen to be moral, we want her to be sexy and without a qualm at the nightmare her eloping antics have spawned. At one point the Troy the movie tries to justify the Trojan war as not being about Helen at all, but about that only Motive that Hollywood understands: Greed. That was a great shame, as the hook of Homer's Illiad (on which Troy is loosely based) is that a trivial woman and prince genuinely do cause ten years of mischief by their beauty alone: the Illiad revels in such trivially induced tragedy and also on gods and men acting upon principles (dodgy principles, but strong principles nonetheless), not a land grab.

>Whiney woman moaning music<

It's ludicrously ironic that a shallow institution (Hollywood natch) that is obsessed with producing shallow movies could miss this point. (Both Helen and Paris are portrayed by Homer as shallow, superficial creatures surrounded by mighty heroes and gods. Helen repents, but much later on, if I recall). Paris himself is portrayed sympathetically in this movie, depriving it of the natural tension of the legend.

>Whiney woman moaning music<

Talking of the Illiad, are were the Gods? Troy the movie is deprived of a spectacle! A few pantheon scenes with Zeus, Hera and their mighty subjects scheming away on Olympus would have been a treat for any Swords and Sandals epic. And where is some of the classic Iliad dialogue? It is a savagely lamentable victory of mammon over art how Hollywood dumbs down its scripts.

>Whiney woman moaning music<

As for Pitt in the star role of Achilles, he doesn't convince as a leader or as an actor in this. He worked hard on ballooning that body into some steroid-like bulk, but he comes over as a wimp's head on the shoulders of a giant. In Fight Club he did come over as reasonably formidable, but here, for some odd reason, he seems dwarfed. Again, this is partly down to woeful directing.

>Whiney woman moaning music<

God (Or should I say, Zeus?) I'm sick of Whiney woman moaning music (Gladiator, if I remember correctly, and The Passion Of The Christ and now Troy). Arrrgh, the Whiney woman moaning music is like tinitus.

>Whiney woman moaning music<

My grumbles about Troy are plentiful but none are fatal, they are scratches that miss all the major arteries. Troy has action; sensational battles; some fantastic characters; it has Peter O-Tool and Brian Cox pissing all over their younger peers; it looks delicious; it is about ancient times; it is memorable. Troy has enough saving graces for me to forgive it its sins. I enjoyed this movie (viewed on the big screen). Time went fast enough given its epic duration. I can forgive anything if it has enough fun.





s s s

spoilers corner


Spoilers!!!!
Warning: this box contains a movie post-mortem analysis that freely gives away important plot twists and details. If you have not yet seen this movie and intend seeing it, avoid this spoilers box until afterwards. Bookmark the page, see the movie, see if you agree with my review then write an arsy comment saying I am talking total b*ll*cks :-)


 



Eric (Mr Incredible Hulk) Bana, played Hector, a role that was extremely sympathetic as a character in both this movie and Homer's legend. But this creates a problem for the modern movie: who is the villain (aside from Agamemnon)? The slaughter of Hector by Achilles would be difficult to justify by not-necessarily-superior modern sentimentality. And here the movie finds itself in the soup. Achilles is the centrepiece of the show: mighty Agamemnon himself laments that Achilles is stealing the thunder of kings. In Homer's Illiad, Achilles is utterly narcissistic and egotistical. Here they try to paint the character as confused about his own motivations. It doesn't work. Pitt doesn't pull off the necessary acting dues, and, worse, the movie itself feels unfocused. It would have been better to portray Achilles as the one dimensional supernatural hero that Homer told us about (the only time Hollywood tires to complicate characters is precisely when it shouldn't!) Surely Hollywood wasn't executing the idea to make their precious "STAR" seem less unsympathetic.. were they? The tension between Agamemnon and Achilles is far more pronounced in the Illiad. In attempting to justify a plot didn't need defending, or in attempting to ameliorate the protagonists' implicit immorality that is the core of Homer, the director has screwed up royally. The chief driver in the Illiad is the wrath of warriors, kings and gods having their selfish desires thwarted and their precious prides wounded. Troy - the movie - didn't have the balls to portray that, so the movie was emasculated.

Hector is portrayed as touchy feely: the reluctant hero role, but Eric Bana, despite being lumbered with this handicap, easily outshines Bloom and Pitt.

>Whiney woman moaning music<

The scene with O'Tool and Pitt together in the tent made for an interesting contrast in acting prowess: tangential to heavy cavalry charging against one-legged sulky boy scouts armed with fearsome pea shooters.

>Whiney woman moaning music<

The battle scenes were what this movie is really about, but much of the fighting was blurred by endless close up can't-see-the-wood-for-the-trees shots. Troy felt like Saving Private Ryan for the beach landing sequence, Lord Of The Rings Trilogy in expansive battle scenes and various movies there after. And this is why Troy is definitely worth seeing, the action is edifying and, thanks to some neat acting (not to be confused with the dalliances of Pitt or Bloom), the going never gets drab.

>Credits (Thank Zeus)<



 


There are no more spoilers below this point, except maybe in any user talkback comments.

End of spoilers corner


s




Jim's preferred ending: The Greeks sneak into Troy in a huge contraption of wooden acting. Oh wait...

Rating: 3.5/5
score


Do you think this movie is any good?

Click on one of the buttons below

12 3456789 10
Ghastly OK Fantastic
s View Results


Add your comment to this page

add a talkback

sssss
From: KrissySubject:2005-01-16 16:49:47
s
From: PhranqueSubject:2005-08-28 05:09:43
s
From: rhondaSubject:2007-04-15 20:13:17
s
From: rhondaSubject:2007-04-15 21:33:05
s
help: how to add your comment

Page hits: 17990



body frame image body frame image
s


www.eadon.com home sweet home contents: more stuff Next uninformed movie review


www.eadon.com