 | | |
| From: |
Fireye | 2001-03-11 17:11:11 |
| Subject: | all-powerfull god suck me to the bone |
| Comment: | What the fuck of all-powerfull god. Me too I am God. What I go to bathroom, watch out the power of God. Seriously, everybody is his own god and everybody have his own power, but some don't find it. I am God and I creat this shit that you call earth! Good joke! |
| | |
| From: |
DjJavy | 2001-04-15 20:21:31 |
| Subject: | Omnipotence? |
| Comment: | heh well you have it down dont ya?
heres another little piece of proof for you:
Can God make a stone so heavy that even he can't lift?
This is Maurode's (I'm not sure how to spell his name) theory on disproving God's all-powerfulness
If yes, then He can't lift it
If no, He can't make it
pe@ce |
| | |
| From: |
Moppy Joe | 2001-04-25 02:15:31 |
| Subject: | God |
| Comment: | You may be frightened by the water at first. It's not the water that scares you but the unseen aquatic life imagined below. You just stare at it for awhile. Wet your toes and sprinkle some over your head. You fear God and rightfully so. For these are new thoughts and he was a bastard God. You really just want to protect your dick though. Face it, you need to go in gradually. God gave you life. God gave you life. God gave you life. |
| | |
| From: |
Drexlus, POEE High Priest, KSC | 2001-06-23 23:14:14 |
| Subject: | Omnipotence of God....and Jim |
| Comment: | Hmmm...can God create a stone he can't lift? The answer is yes...and then he would lift it.
We live in an infinitesimally small part of what exists. We have developed rules to make sense of our little speck of existence. These rules apply to all we see...almost. As you stated yourself, we don't really KNOW what imaginary numbers are. We just know that they are. Nothing is to say that these rules are universal...they are universal as far as we know. Of course, even saying that is a stretch, because our 'universal laws' don't even apply when it comes to quantum physics. Given this, we cannot make any demands that God prove himself by screwing with the 'universal laws', which may not even be universal. Do yourself a favor and search for 'Principia Discordia' in a search engine. Read and savor the bits of truth therein, and may you be elightened. |
| | |
| From: |
Fireye | 2001-07-02 15:35:54 |
| Subject: | god |
| Comment: | God simply doesn't exist. It's not important to know if God can make a rock or not... The fact is the religion separates those who believe from those who do not. Those that do not are unsaved and need to be cleansed by god’s holy light. Those who believe a different religion are worshiping the wrong one, and are too unsaved. Look at the nuts and bolts of any major conflict in the world, past and present, and you will find religion. If people can just pick and choose what they want to believe, what kind of faith is that? Christians claim that Jesus is the one true Lord. There are nearly a dozen other popular religions in our world today, not to mention all those that have died out (I.E., Roman, Mythology). Some religion have no god like some boudist and they don’t go to hell. So God can suck me because God doesn't exist. If you want me to read the pincipa blablabla I will read it but you read all the text of milion people that say that God is history and you will be hit by the true Holy Light. |
| | |
| From: |
Dale | 2001-10-31 23:34:33 |
| Subject: | Your stupid 'proofs'... |
| Comment: | Re: Firstly, is an All-Powerful God subject to Himself, to His own nature? If the answer is yes then he is not All-Powerful as he is constrained by His own nature.
<p>
An 'All-Powerful God' that is 'subject to Himself' is a nonsensical statement.
<p>
Take this example...If I say:
<p>
'Did you enjoy cheating on your wife?'
If you say 'Yes', you must be cheating on your wife! And if you say 'No', you must be cheating on your wife! Therefore, certainly, you are cheating on your wife. Quod erat demonstrandum.
You may not even have a wife...but I've just 'proved' that you're cheating on her.
<p>
...
The 'proof' above makes about as much sense as your 'proof.'
In both, you start with a nonsense statement, analyze the nonsense answers, and come up with a nonsense 'proof.'
...
<p>
An 'All-powerful God' isn't constrained by anything...by definition. |
| | |
| From: |
Rich | 2003-01-20 15:52:30 |
| Subject: | All Powerful God! |
| Comment: | All I can say is one day we will all know the truth. We will all see God in his true form, and when we do, we will all fear him. we will either fear him in Love, or fear him in hate! When we are at that point in our existence, I will turn to you and say 'I am sorry, that I could not show you and answer all your questions. I'm sorry that I was conformed to this human body and mind and knowlege. I tried my best to show you, but, you would not listen! I'm sorry' |
| | |
| From: |
Chris | 2003-03-03 00:17:51 |
| Subject: | Human beings cannot move. |
| Comment: | I can prove it too. Stand in the middle of any room in your house and pick a wall in that room. Where you are standing is point A. Point B is the wall. Mathematically speaaking, in order for you to get to point B, you must first pass the halfway mark (half the distance to the wall). It's only logical, right? Anyone can see that. So walk half the distance to the wall. Now walk half the distance left. Now walk half that distance. Again. Again. Again. Suddenly, you realize that an infinite number of 'halfway points' exists between you and the wall. Logic and math say that you can never reach that spot realistically. But you can reach that spot. You just have to reach out and believe you can, even if it doesn't make sense. |
| | |
| From: |
Chris | 2003-03-03 00:25:28 |
| Subject: | The moral of my last post? |
| Comment: | Basically, there is a lot that can be disproven using logic and reason. And in philosophy related to existentialism, one thing that must quickly be realized is that logic is limited to the physical world. Nature. Ideas like 'love', 'hate', 'God', and 'soul' are all non-material. Intangible. Unmeasurable. Science can NEVER find love. Likewise, science can never understand a concpet such as 'God'. Logically, a being is not omnipotent if it cannot create a rock so heavy that it cannot lift. And logically, if it could, then it would not be omnipotent again. This makes sense in our limited way of human thinking. But then again, you might as well say, 'God is not omnipotent because he cannot make a 5-sided triangle.' By taking a logical impossibility and saying that God cannot make it happen, we seem to 'trap' God... limit him. Why? Because being humans, we cannot fathom limitless things. We yearn for limits... and boundaries... and order. |
| | |
| From: |
Ron | 2004-05-30 23:15:16 |
| Subject: | God as All-Powerful and All-Loving? |
| Comment: | How can God be all-loving and all-powerful at the same time. Let's say that I believe that God is all-powerful, so therefore he can do anything he pleases in our physical world which is in 'nature' and in the non-physical world as well. And let's also say that I believe that God is all-loving which means that he/she loves each and every one of us and does not want us to suffer at all. These two things cannot be true since we see suffering everyday in this world and not just thru our own causes i.e. natural disasters. So God either does not love us or God is not powerful enough to love us. Please email me with your responses at ronserrao@yahoo.com. |
| | |
| From: |
teng wang | 2004-06-14 18:39:30 |
| Subject: | God |
| Comment: | In asking this question, the questioner has already assumed the existence of gravity. By definition, God created everything. Hence, God created gravity. Since God can create gravity, he can certainly make it disappear. So God can move any stone. Put another way, this question could become: if God were to have an arm wrestling match between his right arm and left arm, which arm would win? Both arms belong to God. This is not a contest; there is no winning or losing. Therefore this is a stupid question. |
| | |
| From: |
Mark | 2004-11-28 12:24:32 |
| Subject: | Nonsense |
| Comment: | I'm not going to take you too seriously, but I do want to point out that your arguments are nonsense, and nonsense does not cease to be nonsense just because you attach God's name to it... |
| | |
| From: |
Hovo | 2004-12-18 21:32:29 |
| Subject: | FireEye's God Starts Wars |
| Comment: | How do u explain Hitler, Stalin, and Lenin. They were all aiethiest. Stalin killed over a hundred million ppl and got had nothing to do with it. The fact is that there will be wars |
| | |
| From: |
worm | 2005-03-14 02:23:37 |
| Subject: | god is all lving and all powerful |
| Comment: | You said earlyer that God cannot be allpowerful and all loving at the same time, because People suffer. But look at it this way. AAParents love there children right. But yet they punish it and alow it to suffer. They punish them so they will not get in trouble later. They alow there little bit of suffering to happen so we won't have to suffer as much later. It's the same with god. Our sinfull nature makes it so that there has to be suffering. The only way suffering could stop is by taking away free will and making us in a bunch of mindless robets. He doesn't want a robot world so he gives us free choice. We choose to sin which leads to suffering. So God could stop suffering he just loves to much to become brain dead robots. |
| | |
| From: |
athiesm | 2005-03-14 02:37:21 |
| Subject: | no pruf of god |
| Comment: | There is no pruf that god exsists. Frankly that you believe in some guy in the sky is crazy. |
| | |
| From: |
worm | 2005-03-14 02:43:24 |
| Subject: | yes there is |
| Comment: | THere is also no proff of athiesm. If you believe that by pure chance the whole world just came together in a big bang then that's fine. That The world is exactly the right distance away from they earth for life and that all the complications from gravity to heat to life was all pure chance. And that monkeys came from cats and we came from monkeys. The probability of all that is probably 700 billion to one.Yet if there was an alll powerful being who created all that it makes perfect sence. I think this is much more logical than athiesm (that's just my opinion). To all you athiests I suggest reading te case for christ by Lee strobel with an open heart. Then you make your decision. |
| | |
| From: |
orniter | 2005-10-11 18:08:22 |
| Subject: | Theism vs Atheism |
| Comment: | Theism asserts that it's too improbable that the Universe simply came around with conditions that are so finely tuned for life. It argues that this only makes sense if some magnificent God did it all. This actually answeres nothing, however. Where did God come from? Oh, you say that God is a special entity that simply always was but as long as we're defining concepts to get around paradoxes why not simply say 'existence always was' and cut out the God step? God as an explanation fails because God is not a concept we can comprehend (if we could we would be God, after all). We can't explain why or how or when or where God did all of this creation or even how long it took, if any time at all. Atheism does not have to assert that no god can ever exist, merely that on an individual level we don't believe in gods because we haven't seen good reason or evidence for them. The burden of proof is on the theist making the positive claims. |
| | |
| From: |
John Hookes | 2005-11-14 13:14:55 |
| Subject: | God |
| Comment: | Aside from all the clear philisophical arguments disproving God, it occured to me the other day that if their is a god why do we have rubbish weather. i can appriciate the need for rain, but there is absolutely no reason for it to be cold and windy too. |
| | |
| From: |
wow | 2008-07-05 08:54:54 |
| Subject: | Seriously? |
| Comment: | I sure hope that was tounge in cheek, because otherwise, you are so off the mark friend. Your 'proofs' are nonsense |
| | |
