This is regarding the question Whether or not science has taght us more than religions? Man, this is a great question, I used to think not, definetely. I was absolutley fascinated by religious 'sciences' or philosophy. Then I found out about scientific paradoxes, and other even more fascinating concepts proposed which, even though I don't entirely comprehend them, intrigued me to no end makeing me think so. Now I am starting to realize that science only seems to be a tool, which is being used modernly to help us to understand concepts which the ancients realized centuries ago. I am incredably interested in neuropsychology, and neurophysiology, and the work of claude rifat. I have been comparing the facts presented with hindu myths, and ayurvedic concepts. I am sure that what I have been doing is at best amateur compared to the possabile similarities which could be found, not to mention the fact that I barely understand neuropsychology and neurophysiology, but I study often and I have ambition. It is going slow because I am just starting college, and I have been busy studying. Anyway I think that scince hasn't infact furthered us individually as much as religion, but as a civilization much more, and infact they are on par with each other. Just kinda giving you my input, and I am very impressed with your site, thank you for offering the opportunity to get a glimpse of your reality.
I really like this and havent got to page 2 yet - too excited what I really want to know is are we exchanging quark s constantly and so are we not separate - entities apart from our psyhcological need to be ?are we like ants just antnessing?