Talkback The Secret Sex Lives of the Fundamental Particles

Add your comment

From:	Drexlus, POEE High Priest, KSC	2001-06-23 23:21:11
Subject:	You bely yourself...
Comment:	Your own quote: 'To the naked eye, sperms are not perceptible merrily swimming around in the... ahem... where ever, but just because you can't see them doesn't mean they aren't there. Sperm, like most of the dimensions of the universe, are so tiny that our senses are unable register their existence. Indeed, the hidden dimensions may be coiled up as small as the Planck Length. You are moving in these extra dimension, but don't feel it.' How, then, can you expect to 'prove' that there is no God(s)?
From:	ThatFatMoogle / Justin Dynda	2001-09-01 21:47:23
Subject:	Chicken-Feather VooDoo Physics
Comment:	I'll let the link do the talking for me: http://home1.gte.net/res02khr/crackpots/notorious.htm
From:	jarnie	2002-07-06 15:52:17
Subject:	odd physics
Comment:	For any person thinking that physics makes sense of things take a look at this. Physics doesn't do this anymore. It helps us understand the way things do work but proves that things don't make sense to us.<BR> <BR> For instance time runs at different rates depending on how fast your going.<BR> <BR> It has been absolutly proven that things can be in more than one place, more than one state and travelling in more than one direction at one time. Only when something is 'looked at' does it become in one state, odd?<BR> <BR> Check Out, www.newscientist.com, specifically <A HREF='http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/quantum/quantum.jsp'>Quantum Physics</A>
From:	Mike	2003-09-03 23:05:28
Subject:	Is time a dimension?
Comment:	I've been thinking!Ouch!! Is time really a dimension? Maybe its not a dimension? Electromagnetism isn't a dimension! Are we sure 'that' part of the paradigm is correct? Maybe time is like electromagnetism? Time could be like light! Couldn't it? Time could be an element not a dimension!? Hmmm!!!!
From:	Michael	2003-09-07 01:04:08
Subject:	Time, opps!!!
Comment:	I did not mean to say 'time' was an element. 'THAT WAS RETARTED', I meant to say that time could be a force, instead of a dimension. I just had to add that retraction,I know getting up in the middle of the night to send out ideas is not always brilliant! I need to ask this question! IF we apply chaos theory to to the probablitiy of keeping scientifiic theories on track with nature and our understanding of the universe in regard to evolution. From the big bang foward, and we take into account our limited powers of decimal place understanding. 'How far off could we be in our understanding of what forces, laws and anything else that we think govern the universe as we know it be'? Could it be that our limited brain power could actually diminish our true understanding of the nature of the universe in such a way as to make the truth obout reality as far from strange stange theory is to christian fundamentalism, in daradigm differentialism?
From:	Clayton Carter	2005-05-23 01:30:12
Subject:	Superposition and Gravity
Comment:	The sub-atomic world is VERY small to say the least, but to provide compelling and 'accurate' measurements seems ludacris to me. We hypothesize, we philosophize, but there is no one microscope powerful enough to see smaller than electrons. I know that some mri technology has been helpful, but they are blurry pictures at best. I do understand that the same particle can occupy several positions at once, an infinity really, but they do not maintain this separation. And 'looking' at it doesn't chose the particles position, Einstien once said 'I'd like to think the moon was there, even if I wasn't looking at it.' What causes the collapse is much like the chaotic thermodynamics discussed early. Any system has a limited amount of energy. And for this particle to take up several positions at once it must fight against that funny little gravity to maintain itself, and this requires energy from the system. there is a finite amount of energy spread out over infinate possibilities, though gravity at that level is almost insignificant, it plays a vital role in forcing a particle to return to a place of least gravitational resistance when the sytemic energy is depleted below a crucial point. I do assume that position would be random because the particle would have equal gravitational forces at all positions.