The philosophy section

Nature in a Nutshell


Mother Nature says you cannot appeal!

s menu - click a section what's new at www.eadon.com philosophy movie reviews cartoons - garden of eadon cartoons bible satire pics, images and poems about nun whipping bishops etc :) philosophy wars discussions and battles on religion and many other maddening topics Jim on diets, daft names and other musings Feng Shui Hippo's zodiac - a spoof of astrology and feng shui here is info about me, jim eadon and more read my novel madpole - the maddest but truest philosopher on this planet coincidences of readers etc read and sign my guestbook links s
body frame image body frame image
s



Nature abhors the vacuous

Nature has it in for you

Time is nature's death sentence

Health is nature's short term loan

Humans are nature's Frankensteins

Men are nature's way of deploring common sense

Women are nature's way of defying logic

Youth is nature's gift to the thankless

Old age is nature's punishment to thankless youth

Death is nature's last laugh

There's no such thing as a free lunch unless it is YOU!

Nature and Religion

Enlightenment is nature's red herring

Lies are what nature likes to tell the religious man

Religion is nature's way of ripping off the gullible

A religious man is like a toothless man who believes in tooth fairies

A man who has a fundamentalist religion is like a man who believes in Father Christmas but will murder in cold blood anyone who believes in tooth fairies - and he will murder them in in the name of Father Christmas

A creationist is like a man who insists that the earth is flat because it says so in some old scripture. Then he goes on to claim (falsely, of course) that science supports his ridiculous belief whilst simultaneously denouncing science in the same, hyper-ignorant breath of horseshit.

Universal Truth

Where's there's a schmuck there's a lass


Do you think that Nature is indifferent to suffering?

Click on one of the buttons below

12 3456789 10
She does not care Not sure She really cares
s View Results


Add your comment to this page

add a talkback

sssss
From: DrexlusSubject:2001-06-23 22:18:58
s
From: RedexSubject:2002-02-20 12:50:51
s
From: Wu LiSubject:2003-02-24 08:56:24
s
From: Clayton CarterSubject:2004-01-20 01:33:30
s
From: jordanSubject:2004-06-05 19:42:31
s
From: jordanSubject:2004-06-05 19:43:06
s
From: Clayton CarterSubject:2005-04-28 10:35:30
s
From: Clayton CarterSubject:2005-05-01 05:43:01
s
help: how to add your comment

Page hits: 4666

s s s
On the talkback comments
  In reply to Drexlus: The dastardly second law of thermodynamics confuses once again! The second law permits LOCAL increases of order, so long as the total order of the Universe decreases as a whole. The Universe began with more order than it has now, despite localised regions of relative order, such as our solar system - and us. As for the pile of bricks analogy, this is a bad analogy here, because the bricks are not strongly bound to each other by localised order-causing forces, in the way that atoms are by electromagnetism, and planets/stars are by gravity. To improve your analogy - if you throw down bricks containing powerful magnets - then you would see the creation of local order of sorts. When the bricks collide as they clump together they radiate sound and heat energy. This increases the disorder of the environment, more than counterbalancing the local increase in order.

Thanks for the talkbacks so far
- Jim
 
s



body frame image body frame image
s


www.eadon.com home sweet home contents: more stuff next page


www.eadon.com