The philosophy section

Being Philosophical About Philosophy


Eve braces herself for mankind

s menu - click a section what's new at www.eadon.com philosophy movie reviews cartoons - garden of eadon cartoons bible satire pics, images and poems about nun whipping bishops etc :) philosophy wars discussions and battles on religion and many other maddening topics Jim on diets, daft names and other musings Feng Shui Hippo's zodiac - a spoof of astrology and feng shui here is info about me, jim eadon and more read my novel madpole - the maddest but truest philosopher on this planet coincidences of readers etc read and sign my guestbook links s
body frame image body frame image
s



How good is philosophy at getting at the truth?


Thinkers from Aristotle to Descartes have long considered the nature of space, time and matter. Yet not one philosopher conceived the key theories of space, time and matter: Relativity and Quantum Mechanics.

So thinking, as a standalone activity, is an unreliable way of arriving at truth. Only experiment and observation can be the ultimate judge of what is closest to the truth.

Is philosophy self-consistent? Bertrand Russel, the famous mathematician and philosopher, showed that feeding logic back into itself creates horrible paradoxes. Lobbing the dung of self-referential logic into the mathematical fan, he showed, to the chagrin of purists, that the illogic of such paradoxes destroys the belief that mathematics is internally consistent.

The statement "I am lying to you" is a paradox, as the ancient Greek philosopher Ipimenides pointed out. The equivalent paradox can be constructed mathematically. The fact that mathematics gives rise to paradoxes means that all mathematics is built upon shaky foundations.

The statement, "All philosophy is untrue", is a philosophy in its own right. If it is true then it says it is not true! If it is not true then it is true! Philosophy can quickly lead to a paradox! Philosophy itself is, at its very core, defective.

So, in conclusion, philosophy may be great for many things, but it remains fundamentally unsuited to ferreting out truth.

However, as imperfect a tool as philosophy is, it is far superior to religion as a means for understanding truth. A man who seeks to learn truth by practising religion is like a man who seeks to eat by sewing his mouth shut.

Is philosophy a path that leads to the truth?

Click on one of the buttons below

12 3456789 10
Never Sometimes Always
s View Results


Add your comment to this page

add a talkback

sssss
From: MadPoleSubject:2000-11-26 08:43:19
s
From: bryonySubject:2001-04-26 05:24:13
s
From: ChestRockwellSubject:2001-06-07 08:37:09
s
From: DaleSubject:2001-10-31 23:46:12
s
From: MadPuke again...Subject:2001-12-07 13:59:18
s
From: Wu LiSubject:2003-02-22 09:53:38
s
From: Clayton CarterqSubject:2004-01-20 01:54:41
s
From: PfunkSubject:2004-05-06 19:28:29
s
From: BruceSubject:2004-05-30 08:25:44
s
From: Thomas channingSubject:2005-12-22 16:46:28
s
From: CaseySubject:2006-06-30 22:55:08
s
help: how to add your comment

Page hits: 6416


Sai on philosophy


body frame image body frame image
s


www.eadon.com home sweet home contents: more stuff next page


www.eadon.com